23 Sep 2020
23 Sep 2020
For Marketing Purposes:
FOR QUALIFIED INVESTORS ONLY– This document is reserved and must be given in Switzerland exclusively to Qualified Investors as defined by the Swiss Collective Investment Scheme Act of 23 June 2006 (as amended from time to time, CISA).
When a decision has been made to invest in line with climate or ESG considerations, an investor is faced with an important choice: active manager or index fund?
Some argue active managers are best-placed to implement sustainable strategies such as environmental, social and governance (ESG) or climate change investing, because they can make considered decisions to buy or sell companies based on observed behaviours. Others maintain that index funds can achieve the same goals in a transparent and rules-based way for a fraction of the cost.
As the money invested in climate-friendly and socially-responsible strategies rises, it becomes more important to investigate which approach works best for achieving certain investment goals. On this question rely major pools of capital that could make a significant contribution to a sustainable future for the planet.
In this article, we outline three factors which we believe support an index-based approach for climate and ESG investing, in 2020 and the decades beyond.
Thanks to improvements in data quality, investment indices today can be built to reflect all sorts of climate and ESG policies – then make them accessible to investors at a low cost.
Innovations in this area include exclusionary screens that filter out, as an example, companies that consume or extract high amounts of thermal coal. They include the implementation of specific values such as gender equality, or stock selection based on carbon ratings, or alignment with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). All these varied objectives and more are now codified in indices, meaning most sustainable investment objectives may now be achieved using an index-based approach.
The variety of new sustainable indices means they could be used in a variety of new ways; as portfolio cores, for example, that could substitute traditional market-capitalisation weighted indices for ones that weight by ESG scores, with limited tracking error. Some values-orientated or broad sustainability indices may be used as diversifiers whenever implementing those convictions justifies a higher tracking error.
Overall, better data means better indices and more ways to invest with an index-based approach in a transparent, low-cost and rules-based way – all important considerations for investors looking to generate long term sustainable performance.
Much of sustainable investing practice is focused on ‘impact’, which means assessing an investment’s social or environmental effect alongside its financial return.
Impact investing is often associated with private loans and private equity, where active funds are clearly well-placed to play a role. Yet, the same principles that support investing in private assets – intentionality, additionality, measurability – are also reflected in the publicly-listed assets generally tracked by ETFs.
And because listed assets have higher liquidity than unlisted ones, an index investor can mobilise larger amounts of capital and make it work towards their ESG goals.
Some examples of how Lyxor’s ETFs help investors deploy capital towards important sustainable goals include our funds contributing to UN SDGs, which invest to support climate action, water, clean and affordable energy and gender equality. Our ESG Trend Leaders range invests in companies with a rising ESG trend, not only the best-rated ones, as we believe it makes more impact to reward companies actively making changes.
One concern among investors comparing active and index-based strategies for sustainable investing is shareholder engagement: can a passive investor really hold portfolio companies to account?
Some passive managers, including Lyxor, have tackled this by setting up voting policies like an active manager. These policies and voting records are public and the manager is accountable to fund holders. In Lyxor’s shareholder engagement policy it also involves a direct dialogue with companies to communicate expectations, for example with respect to governance.
In our updated 2020 voting policy, we have upped the ante for company engagement, with climate change considerations in particular taking a more prominent role. We may now refuse to grant discharge to a board of directors or to approve the reappointment of members in the case of environmental controversies or a lack of transparency concerning greenhouse gas emissions. From 2021, we may also refuse the chairman re-election of any board where the company refuses to uphold the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), a framework designed to help companies and ESG investors better manage their exposure to climate risks and opportunities.
On top of that, Lyxor will be able to vote against resolutions concerning executives’ compensation if extra-financial measures have not been sufficiently considered within remuneration policies.
This shows it is possible to encourage sustainable business practice with index investing – if that investment is with a responsible ‘active’ passive manager.
The combination of better sustainability data, the scalability of index-based investing, and the power of company engagement by major passive managers, means investors can confidently use index-based strategies to achieve sustainable investment goals.
Here at Lyxor, we have made it our mission to provide investors with all sorts of index products that increase the options for climate, ESG, and values-based investing. Our pioneering Green Bonds ETF invests only in green bonds approved by the Climate Bonds Initiative, ensuring proceeds are strictly earmarked to pro-climate projects and assets.
Similarly, where the landmark Paris Agreement committed the countries of the world to limit global warming to “well below” 2°C and “pursue efforts to limit” it to 1.5°C above preindustrial levels, research is demonstrating that there are major differences in the outcome of +2°C versus +1.5°C for the sustainability of human ecosystems,1 and rules-based indexes can be designed to match this most ambitious target.
Our climate transition ETFs launched this year are designed to help investors meet this goal by starting their climate transition plans right now, using core equity indices built by S&P and MSCI. These benchmarks give higher weights to companies with a capacity to manage and contribute to climate transition through the reduction of carbon emissions.
In the same way that the $6.7tn ETF industry2 caused an unquestionable shift in the investment landscape, we’re delighted to see a shift of similar scope towards better, greener portfolios.3 Choices now abound for long term investors seeking to invest sustainably, and index investing has many benefits in the fight against climatete change that make it worth taking seriously.
1Source: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Special Report, October 2018, https://report.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_spm_final.pdf
2Source: ETFGI, as at Sep 2020.
3Source: GSIA, 2018 Global Sustainable Investment Review.
This document has been provided by Lyxor International Asset Management that is solely responsible for its content.
|FUND NAME||SUB FUND NAME||COUNTRY OF DOMICILE|
|MULTI UNITS LUXEMBOURG||Lyxor MSCI USA Climate Change UCITS ETF - Acc||Luxembourg|
|MULTI UNITS LUXEMBOURG||Lyxor MSCI World Climate Change (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc||Luxembourg|
|MULTI UNITS LUXEMBOURG||Lyxor MSCI Europe Climate Change (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc||Luxembourg|
|MULTI UNITS LUXEMBOURG||Lyxor MSCI EM Climate Change UCITS ETF - Acc||Luxembourg|
|MULTI UNITS LUXEMBOURG||Lyxor S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate (EU PAB) (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc||Luxembourg|
|MULTI UNITS LUXEMBOURG||Lyxor S&P Global Developed Paris-Aligned Climate (EU PAB) (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc||Luxembourg|
|MULTI UNITS LUXEMBOURG||Lyxor S&P Europe Paris-Aligned Climate (EU PAB) (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc||Luxembourg|
|MULTI UNITS LUXEMBOURG||Lyxor S&P Eurozone Paris-Aligned Climate (EU PAB) (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc||Luxembourg|
The funds that are listed in the chart comprised in this document (Funds) are collective investment schemes not approved by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA (FINMA) as foreign collective investment schemes pursuant to article 120 of the Swiss Collective Investment Schemes Act of 23 June 2006 (as amended from time to time, CISA) for distribution in Switzerland. Accordingly, the non-Registered Funds may be offered in Switzerland exclusively to Qualified Investors as defined in the CISA and its implementing ordinance.
The shares are not registered under the U.S Securities Act of 1933 and may not be directly or indirectly offered or sold in the United States (including its territories or possessions) or to or for the benefit of a U.S Person (being a “United State Person” within the meaning of Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933 of the United States, as amended, and/or any person not included in the definition of “Non-United States Person” within the meaning of Section 4.7 (a) (1) (iv) of the rules of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission.). No U.S federal or state securities commission has reviewed or approved this document and more generally any documents with respect to or in connection with the fund. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offence.
Past performance is no indication of current or future performance. The performance data do not take into account of the commissions and costs incurred on the issue and redemption of units.
Financial intermediaries (including particularly, representatives of private banks or independent asset managers, Intermediaries) are hereby reminded on the strict regulatory requirements applicable under the CISA to any distribution of foreign collective investment schemes in Switzerland. It is each Intermediary’s sole responsibility to ensure that (i) all these requirements are put in place prior to any Intermediary distributing any of the Funds presented in this document and (ii) that otherwise, it does not take any action that could constitute distribution of collective investment schemes in Switzerland as defined in article 3 CISA and related regulation.
Any information in this document is given only as of the date of this document and is not updated as of any date thereafter.
This document is for information purposes only and does not constitute an offer, an invitation to make an offer, a solicitation or recommendation to invest in collective investment schemes. This document is not a prospectus as per article 652a or 1156 of the Swiss Code of Obligations, a listing prospectus according to the listing rules of the SIX Swiss Exchange or any other trading venue as defined by the Swiss Financial Market Infrastructure Act of 19 June 2015 (as amended from time to time, FMIA), a simplified prospectus, a key investor information document or a prospectus as defined in the CISA.An investment in collective investment schemes involves significant risks that are described in each prospectus or offering memorandum. Each potential investor should read the entire prospectus or offering memorandum and should carefully consider the risk warnings and disclosures before making an investment decision.
Any benchmarks/indices cited in this document are provided for information purposes only.
This document is not the result of a financial analysis and therefore is not subject to the “Directive on the Independence of Financial Research” of the Swiss Bankers Association.
This document does not contain personalized recommendations or advice and is not intended to substitute any professional advice on investments in financial products.
The Representative and the Paying Agent of the Fund(s) in Switzerland is Société Générale, Paris, Zurich Branch, Talacker 50, 8001 Zurich.
The prospectus or offering memorandum, the key investor information documents, the management regulation, the articles of association and/or any other constitutional documents as well as the annual and semi-annual financial reports may be obtained free of charge from the Representative in Switzerland.