08 Jun 2021

Webcast recap: Why switching to ESG corporate bonds is a natural choice


Marketing document – FOR QUALIFIED INVESTORS ONLY– This document is reserved and must be given in Switzerland exclusively to Qualified Investors as defined by the Swiss Collective Investment Scheme Act of 23 June 2006 (as amended from time to time, CISA).

On 25 May, Lyxor was delighted to host a webcast on responsible bond investing with experts from Bloomberg. It was a rare chance to hear straight from the experts in both credit markets and ESG, and to ask your questions on this topic. Below are a few edited highlights from the webcast, which you can listen to in full here.

Mahesh Bhimalingam, Chief European Credit Strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence, started by setting the scene, then explained what he sees as the key story for corporate bonds in 2021. In his view, there is plenty of opportunity within the high yield space in 2021.

MB: The key story for credit in 2021 will be – not credit – but rates. The Covid hit last year resulted, perversely, in one of the best years for credit. Despite vast stimulus from central bank buying, rates went down. As a result, we saw exceptional returns from IG [investment grade] and HY [high yield] corporate bonds.

2021 is a recovery year, which means we might see rates go up as inflation expectations rise. The Bund yield has already risen by around 48 basis points.

Remember it’s a recovery year, and HY spreads are typically supported in recovery. Inflation suits HY too, and IG doesn’t have the same cushion in a rising rate environment. Investors don’t have much of a choice – from a valuation and risk perspective, as an investor you really have to look at high yield this year.

Listen to the full webcast to hear the rest of Mahesh’s presentation:

  • ESG index characteristics vs parent
  • How ESG screening affects sector weights
  • Why tracking error differs between IG and HY ESG 

AJ Lindeman, Head of Index and ESG Quantitative Research at Bloomberg, went on to share his insights on the application of ESG to corporate bond indices.

AJL : When we analyse the ESG factor in corporate bonds, our starting point is not that ESG should have a systematic excess return per se. Socially responsible sustainable investors have additional objectives: policies, social norms, values alignment and so on. So, we look at what kind of trade-offs are made to realise these additional objectives.

Where might these trade-offs come from? How do we determine implications of ESG tilting on portfolios?

Generally, market participants tend to prefer portfolio construction methods that are easy to understand. That’s one reason for the popularity of the rules-based approach to ESG, manifested typically with ESG screens and controversial business exclusions.

Yet these screens can change sector weights and risk characteristics in a portfolio – for fixed income investors, credit quality and duration; for equity investors, style factor exposure.

How do we determine the “ESG only” effect? By changing the portfolio construction technique. What if we could implement an ESG tilt without changing other portfolio characteristics – this should isolate the ESG effect in an allocation. This can be achieved with model portfolios that are constructed with more precision than rules-based techniques allow.

Listen to the full webcast to hear the rest of AJ’s presentation:

  • The relative performance of hypothetical ‘ESG Max’ and ‘ESG Min’ portfolios
  • Untangling ESG factors’ correlation to other risk factors
  • ESG’s potential for downside risk protection

Finally, Philippe Baché, Head of Fixed Income at Lyxor ETF, explained the rationale behind ESG credit, and illustrated how similarly ESG credit indices behave to traditional benchmarks from a risk, return and tracking error perspective. In his view, several factors make the switch a natural choice for bond investors.

PB: ESG in the credit market simply means adding non-financial criteria to a standard bond allocation, and doing so has several benefits.

First, it provides a framework to align values, for example by screening out bond issuing companies operating in areas such as tobacco or thermal coal. It also helps investors to align with new regulation, such as the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) which increases the incentive to integrate ESG. There is growing evidence that ESG criteria can help mitigate drawdowns too, while the risk/return characteristics of ESG and non-ESG indices are closely aligned enough to make the transition simple.

The Bloomberg Barclays MSCI Sustainable SRI indices tracked by Lyxor’s credit ETFs all have an ESG screen. Once the parent index is selected, a liquidity filter is applied that removes smaller bonds. Issuers without an ESG rating are removed, then ESG criteria are applied.

The ESG screen excludes issuers with a MSCI ESG rating below BBB, who are subject to any very severe controversies, and who are involved in certain activities and businesses, such as alcohol, tobacco, gambling, unconventional oil and gas, thermal coal. We believe in this methodology to the extent that every one of our physical credit ETFs follows it. 

Listen to the full webcast to hear the rest of Philippe’s presentation:

  • ESG index characteristics vs parent
  • How ESG screening affects sector weights
  • Why tracking error differs between IG and HY ESG 

Q&A questions

  • What is your 3-4 year view on IG credit?
  • What is the market impact of ESG filters?
  • Can you explain the benefits of excluding low ESG ratings? 

Watch the replay to hear the answers:

The view from Lyxor

The day is coming when a company’s fortunes will depend on the size of its carbon footprint, the global warming scenario it implies and its willingness to address broader societal issues, just as much as ordinary financial metrics. The best investment decisions keep this bigger picture in mind.

Our recent insight piece explains why we believe the long-term future of performance is green and responsible.

Investing in our unique range of ESG bonds could help you secure a brighter financial future for those you advise or those you love.

As always, you can visit our new ESG Hub to learn more about Lyxor’s ESG range.

This article is for informative purposes only, and should not be taken as investment advice. Lyxor ETF does not in any way endorse or promote any companies mentioned in this article. The opinions expressed by Mahesh Bhimalingam and AJ Lindeman are their own, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Lyxor International Asset Management or Societe Generale. Capital at risk. Please read our Risk Warning below.

Risk Warning

Key risks of Lyxor ETFs
It is important for potential investors to evaluate the risks described below and in the fund prospectus which can be found on lyxoretf.com   

CAPITAL AT RISK: ETFs are tracking instruments: Their risk profile is similar to a direct investment in the Underlying Index. Investors’ capital is fully at risk and investors may not get back the amount originally invested. 

REPLICATION RISK: The fund objectives might not be reached due to unexpected events on the underlying markets which will impact the index calculation and the efficient fund replication. 

COUNTERPARTY RISK: With synthetic ETFs, investors are exposed to risks resulting from the use of  OTC swaps. In-line with UCITS guidelines, the exposure to a swap counterparty cannot exceed 10% of the total fund assets. Physically replicated ETFs may have counterparty risk if they use a securities lending program. 

UNDERLYING RISK: The Underlying Index of a Lyxor ETF may be complex and volatile. When investing in commodities, the Underlying Index is calculated with reference to commodity futures contracts exposing the investor to a liquidity risk linked to costs such as cost of carry and transportation. ETFs exposed to Emerging Markets carry a greater risk of potential loss than investment in Developed Markets as they are exposed to a wide range of unpredictable Emerging Market risks. 

CURRENCY RISK: ETFs may be exposed to currency risk if the ETF is denominated in a currency different to that of the Underlying Index they are tracking. This means that exchange rate fluctuations could have a negative or positive effect on returns. 

LIQUIDITY RISK: Liquidity is provided by registered market-makers on the respective stock exchange where the ETF is listed, including Societe Generale. On exchange liquidity may be limited as a result of a suspension in the underlying market represented by the Underlying Index tracked by the ETF; a failure in the systems of one of the relevant stock exchanges, Societe Generale or other market-maker systems; or an abnormal trading situation or event.

CONCENTRATION RISK: Some ETFs, e.g. thematic and Smart Beta ETFs, select stocks or bonds for their portfolio from the original benchmark index. Where selection rules are extensive it can lead to a more concentrated portfolio where risk is spread over fewer stocks than the original benchmark.


This document has been provided by Lyxor International Asset Management that is solely responsible for its content. 

This document is not to be deemed distribution of funds in Switzerland according to the Swiss collective investment schemes act of 23 June 2006 (as amended from time to time, CISA) or any other applicable Swiss laws or regulations.

The shares are not registered under the U.S Securities Act of 1933 and may not be directly or indirectly offered or sold in the United States (including its territories or possessions) or to or for the benefit of a U.S Person (being a “United State Person” within the meaning of Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933 of the United States, as amended, and/or any person not included in the definition of “Non-United States Person” within the meaning of Section 4.7 (a) (1) (iv) of the rules of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission.). No U.S federal or state securities commission has reviewed or approved this document and more generally any documents with respect to or in connection with the fund. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offence. 

Past performance is no indication of current or future performance. The performance data do not take into account of the commissions and costs incurred on the issue and redemption of units.

Financial intermediaries (including particularly, representatives of private banks or independent asset managers, Intermediaries) are hereby reminded on the strict regulatory requirements applicable under the CISA to any distribution of foreign collective investment schemes in Switzerland. It is each Intermediary’s sole responsibility to ensure that (i) all these requirements are put in place prior to any Intermediary distributing any of the Funds presented in this document and (ii) that otherwise, it does not take any action that could constitute distribution of collective investment schemes in Switzerland as defined in article 3 CISA and related regulation.

Any information in this document is given only as of the date of this document and is not updated as of any date thereafter. 

This document is for information purposes only and does not constitute an offer, an invitation to make an offer, a solicitation or recommendation to invest in collective investment schemes.  This document is not a prospectus as per article 652a or 1156 of the Swiss Code of Obligations, a listing prospectus according to the listing rules of the SIX Swiss Exchange or any other trading venue as defined by the Swiss Financial Market Infrastructure Act of 19 June 2015 (as amended from time to time, FMIA), a simplified prospectus, a key investor information document or a prospectus as defined in the CISA.
An investment in collective investment schemes involves significant risks that are described in each prospectus or offering memorandum. Each potential investor should read the entire prospectus or offering memorandum and should carefully consider the risk warnings and disclosures before making an investment decision. 

Any benchmarks/indices cited in this document are provided for information purposes only.

This document is not the result of a financial analysis and therefore is not subject to the “Directive on the Independence of Financial Research” of the Swiss Bankers Association. 

This document does not contain personalized recommendations or advice and is not intended to substitute any professional advice on investments in financial products. 

Research disclaimer

Lyxor International Asset Management (“LIAM”) or its employees may have or maintain business relationships with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that LIAM and its employees may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. Please see appendix at the end of this report for the analyst(s) certification(s), important disclosures and disclaimers. Alternatively, visit our global research disclosure website www.lyxoretf.com/compliance.

Conflicts of interest

This research contains the views, opinions and recommendations of Lyxor International Asset Management (“LIAM”) Cross Asset and ETF research analysts and/or strategists. To the extent that this research contains trade ideas based on macro views of economic market conditions or relative value, it may differ from the fundamental Cross Asset and ETF Research opinions and recommendations contained in Cross Asset and ETF Research sector or company research reports and from the views and opinions of other departments of LIAM and its affiliates. Lyxor Cross Asset and ETF research analysts and/or strategists routinely consult with LIAM sales and portfolio management personnel regarding market information including, but not limited to, pricing, spread levels and trading activity of ETFs tracking equity, fixed income and commodity indices. Trading desks may trade, or have traded, as principal on the basis of the research analyst(s) views and reports. Lyxor has mandatory research policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to (i) ensure that purported facts in research reports are based on reliable information and (ii) to prevent improper selective or tiered dissemination of research reports. In addition, research analysts receive compensation based, in part, on the quality and accuracy of their analysis, client feedback, competitive factors and LIAM’s total revenues including revenues from management fees and investment advisory fees and distribution fees.